I was unable get the old avatars reimported. Regretfully, you will have to upload your avatar again. Please report any issues here,.

CFmoto ADVlite

General BS :bull: and other irrelevant chit-chat :kumbaya:
Post Reply
User avatar
Bucho
DAMN Admin
Posts: 6543
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:57 am
Contact:

CFmoto ADVlite

Post by Bucho »

https://www.cycleworld.com/bikes/cfmoto ... irst-look/

I think this has some promise. Its an interesting size, somewhat small but still has a twin for longer road sections.
Yamaha WR250R
Yamaha TW200
User avatar
Firebolter
DAMN Grand Poohba
Posts: 2467
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: CFmoto ADVlite

Post by Firebolter »

It's about time for a mid size twin. These cheaper chinese based bikes will do pretty well I am sure. KYB suspension and it looks pretty sweet. I think KTM, Husky and the other big euro boyz are in for some market share going away. Probably not enough to hurt them, but CFMoto is looking like they have a future-
Lots of cool bikes---
smdub
DAMN Poohba
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:21 pm
Contact:

Re: CFmoto ADVlite

Post by smdub »

Why does anyone want a small twin (esp a low powered one)? Add enough balance shafts and detune a 450 single and you'd have a lighter, smaller, simpler, cheaper engine. Still add all the other ADV bits and bodywork but throw away one intake/throttle body/header. Ok, twins do sound better.

Big twins make total sense. For high output its just impractical to get the flow and rpms required in a big single cylinder. But at 44hp CFMoto has none of that. A modern (redesigned) DRZ400 engine would beat that.
Stephen (not Steve) - '20 Husky 701LR / KTM '20 500 EXC / '17 150 XC-W / '21 E-XC / '21 890R / '19 Sherco 300FST / Sur-Ron LBX / Segway X160 / Sur-Ron Ultra Bee
User avatar
Firebolter
DAMN Grand Poohba
Posts: 2467
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: CFmoto ADVlite

Post by Firebolter »

They will be MUCH SMOOTHER at 50-70mph speeds over a single, that's why- Added balancers only do so much to smooth a single out at speed. A lot of new riders just want a smaller, cheaper bike that is not so much a ball buster on a nice longer ride like a DRZ is. For a bunch of new riders It's not always about power and it is not about true dirt worthiness. It is about a cheap, smooth bike to ride to work occasionally and go take a Sunday ride with some friends in the forest roads etc.
Lots of cool bikes---
smdub
DAMN Poohba
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:21 pm
Contact:

Re: CFmoto ADVlite

Post by smdub »

You can make a single vibration similar to a twin. The second piston in a twin is literally a (poor) balance mass. It solves some but adds vibration in a whole different axis. I don't know of any small singles that emply multiple masses but it could be done. The only disadvantage a single has is one pulse per revolution. Trades the out of plane vibration of a twin for a torque based one. Solveable w/ a heavier flywheel (or even a dual mass one like many cars use now.)

It looks like they just used a higher output motor they already had, but detuned. That explains the twin. Cheaper than developing a new motor.

I still contend that a balanced single would be a better motor. Smooth, cheaper, lighter, more reliable(less parts). Just a one trick pony that not many want to spend the resources to develop. Scaling down the newer 690/701 motor would be a sweet little thing.
Stephen (not Steve) - '20 Husky 701LR / KTM '20 500 EXC / '17 150 XC-W / '21 E-XC / '21 890R / '19 Sherco 300FST / Sur-Ron LBX / Segway X160 / Sur-Ron Ultra Bee
User avatar
Twist
DAMN Poohba
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 6:42 am
Contact:

Re: CFmoto ADVlite

Post by Twist »

I think the bike I would be giving serious consideration to in a mid-size ADV bike would be the new Honda Transalp. It looks like a lot of bang for the buck but I haven't ridden one yet. If I were shopping for, say, a TAT bike this one or a T7 might get the nod.
The two most important days in your life are the day you were born and the day you figure out why. - Mark Twain
Post Reply