I was unable get the old avatars reimported. Regretfully, you will have to upload your avatar again. Please report any issues here,.

Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

This forum is for all OHV/ORV/Land Use messages and discussions
User avatar
Rut Row
Benevolent Dictator
Posts: 9755
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:39 am
Contact:

Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by Rut Row »

Good news! Senate Bill 80 was killed in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. This bill would have required ATV riders to wear helmets on public and private property.

This was a joint effort by ABATE of MD and the MD OHV Alliance. ABATE lobbied directly and the Alliance worked behind the scenes "educating and informing."

Note: The Alliance is a 501(c)(3) and cannot lobby but it can "educate and inform." :harhar:
Ken
Die young as late as possible, remember who you were before the world told you how it should be. -- Barry Morris
User avatar
anotherguy
DAMN Expert
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:04 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by anotherguy »

Just curious. Why is this good? Don't get me wrong I'm anti-everything when it comes to legislation but on what grounds did this make sense in todays ATGATT atmosphere?
User avatar
Rut Row
Benevolent Dictator
Posts: 9755
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by Rut Row »

anotherguy wrote:Just curious. Why is this good? Don't get me wrong I'm anti-everything when it comes to legislation but on what grounds did this make sense in todays ATGATT atmosphere?

The private property aspect is objectionable to many people. (1) do you want someone coming into your backyard to check for helmets? (2) It is not going to be enforced. The local sheriff or police aren't going to check your yard or farm.

Public riding areas already require protective gear.

Why pass a law that will be totally ignored by law enforcement and is already required on public land?

We all agree ATGATT. I won't ride with someone who won't wear protective gear.
Ken
Die young as late as possible, remember who you were before the world told you how it should be. -- Barry Morris
User avatar
BigBird
DAMN Grand Poohba
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by BigBird »

Ken, As you know I'm a solid supporter of all your great efforts and of the MD OHV Alliance. THANKS AGAIN for all you do!

IMO it is a big mistake for the Alliance to do anything that unnecessarily associates The Alliance with ABATE in the eyes of the public or of the gov. officials.

From what I know of ABATE and what I imagine most people think when they see the term ABATE is that it is a group that is anti-helmet law focused. This is at best a controversial position and is very ideologically and politically charged. IMO it is a position that many in the general public view as making motorcyclists look less than smart/responsible. Thus it undermines the support of motorcyclists among the general public and hurts our chances of getting public support for important NON political MC/OHV objectives. IMO this is a pragmatic view for OHV supporters to take regardless of where they personally stand on helmet laws.
Sam Jones - Frederick MD
GL1800 DCT TRIO Tilting Trike - KTM 525 EXC - KTM 200 XCW - 2 KTM Freeride 250Rs - TRS 300 Xtrack Trials
Lots of E-Bikes/MCs
Polaris RZR 800
Lots of MTBs and Road Bikes and a BamBuk Recumbant Tandem Trike eBike
User avatar
Rut Row
Benevolent Dictator
Posts: 9755
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by Rut Row »

BigBird wrote:Ken, As you know I'm a solid supporter of all your great efforts and of the MD OHV Alliance. THANKS AGAIN for all you do!

IMO it is a big mistake for the Alliance to do anything that unnecessarily associates The Alliance with ABATE in the eyes of the public or of the gov. officials.

From what I know of ABATE and what I imagine most people think when they see the term ABATE is that it is a group that is anti-helmet law focused. This is at best a controversial position and is very ideologically and politically charged. IMO it is a position that many in the general public view as making motorcyclists look less than smart/responsible. Thus it undermines the support of motorcyclists among the general public and hurts our chances of getting public support for important NON political MC/OHV objectives. IMO this is a pragmatic view for OHV supporters to take regardless of where they personally stand on helmet laws.
Hi Sam - I understand your sentiments completely. It took me a while to warm to these guys.

Having said that, this isn't your Momma's ABATE. They run a pretty slick operation. I'm not sure where this will lead or end. I'm not the only voice in that decision.
Ken
Die young as late as possible, remember who you were before the world told you how it should be. -- Barry Morris
User avatar
phoo
aka "That Guy"
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:38 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by phoo »

I decided to delete my true opinion and say that I agree with Sam. I trust your judgment and thank you for all of your efforts, but I have never agreed with ABATE's methods.
2003 Triumph Sprint ST :: 2004 Suzuki SV650R
2016 Beta 300RR :: 2006 Suzuki DRZ400SM
1975 Harley FXE1200
User avatar
bonehead
DAMN Poohba
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by bonehead »

Where as I never allow any of my kids to ride without a helmet on my property is still is my property.
If they had made the law for only public property then I wouldn't have an issue with it.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend can be applied here.
It's All Good, So Make The Day A Good One!!!
User avatar
anotherguy
DAMN Expert
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:04 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by anotherguy »

IMHO laws of this kind need to be signed into place and then beaten soundly in the courts. California(!!!???),Ohio and Florida judges have declared speed cameras unconstitutional so the foundation is being laid to eliminate them nationwide. We need to endure some hardship to rid ourselves of this crap permanently. Do any of you really believe this is the last attempt to enact this legislation?
User avatar
Rut Row
Benevolent Dictator
Posts: 9755
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by Rut Row »

anotherguy wrote:IMHO laws of this kind need to be signed into place and then beaten soundly in the courts. California(!!!???),Ohio and Florida judges have declared speed cameras unconstitutional so the foundation is being laid to eliminate them nationwide. We need to endure some hardship to rid ourselves of this crap permanently. Do any of you really believe this is the last attempt to enact this legislation?
I like your logic. And no, this legislation is being pushed by the Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA) which represents the manufacturers. They want this to reduce their liability exposure. SVIA has been pushing laws in all the states to make riding ATVs, UTVs, side-by-sides on paved roads illegal for exactly the same reason. I listened to their lobbyist talk on that subject at the NOVCC conference.
Ken
Die young as late as possible, remember who you were before the world told you how it should be. -- Barry Morris
BillyGoat
DAMN Expert
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Mandatory ATV Helmet Bill Killed in Committee

Post by BillyGoat »

I agree with Sam. I'd stay far away from ABATE. I'd also agree with farmers who'd say this law, if passed, was a pain for them.
KTM 450 EXC mostly
Member AMA, PaTRA, MD OHV Alliance, trying to join R&T
Post Reply